
From the President's Desk
by Tom Cox, TMLA President
CENTRAL MINNESOTA’S POPULATION is projected to grow more than 40 percent
over the next 25 years, this according to Kathy Gaalswyk, President of the
Initiative Foundation, writing in the Sept. 9th edition of the
Pilot-Independent. According to Jennifer Hawkins, Minnesota’s Region 5
Development Commission economic development director, as reported in the July
13th edition of the Pine Cone Press-Citizen, the state demographer expects Cass
County’s population to increase nearly 70%, from 27,150 in 2000 to 45,300 by
2030!
WHAT DOES BURGEONING growth mean to members of the TMLA? Among other things,
it surely means more developmental pressure on the lake and its environs. We see
signs of growth all around us, in older buildings being demolished and replaced
with expanded cabins and year-round homes, in the upgrading of state and local
roads, in proposals for denser development (e.g., the proposed Kenfield Pines
Planned Unit Development – PUD – at the south end of Kenfield Bay) and in
the development of new businesses where before we saw only forests (e.g., the
new 371 Storage Complex adjacent to the Paul Bunyan Trail on CSAH 6).
IT WAS IN RESPONSE to member suggestions that the TMLA had not been proactive
enough on issues related to the upgrading of CSAH 6 this summer, that an
opportunity was given at the Annual Meeting for people to express their interest
in the formation of an Association “Preservation Committee.” We do presently
have a Zoning Committee, which pays attention to zoning variance and PUD
applications. The thought was that the TMLA might be well served by having
another committee, one that would look beyond zoning variance issues to the
broader picture of future development and its potential impact on the lake.
AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, six members volunteered their interest in the possible
formation of such a committee. We held an exploratory meeting on Sept 11, when,
as it turned out, only one of those volunteers was able to come. However, our
Vice President, Al Griggs, our Watershed Coordinator, John Alden, one volunteer
- Tom Moore, and I met that morning to discuss what the mission of such a group
might be. We also agreed that the committee might better be called a
Conservation Committee.
WE IDENTIFIED several things on which a Conservation Committee might focus
its attention:
 | Esthetics of development and conformity with County guidelines. |
 | Local road upgrades (County 6, 50 and 71). |
 | Additional Public Access to Ten Mile. |
 | Volunteer service on the citizens’ advisory committee to the
Environmental Services Department. |
 | Identification of language in the TMLA Long Range plan that opens the door
to this Committee’s taking action on long range goals. |
 | Stewardship of TMLA’s seven lake shore parcels. |
 | Acquisition of additional properties. |
 | Research, education and action proposals on Conservation Easements. |
 | Systematic outreach/liaison to other organizations that share TMLA’s
goals, such as the Association of Cass County Lakes, Sky Blue Waters Joint
Powers Board, the Tri-County Leech Lake Watershed Project, the Minnesota
Lakes Association, the Trust for Public Lands and the Minnesota Land Trust. |
 | Second and third tier property development, lake access and carrying
capacities of lakes. |
 | Governor Pawlenty’s North Central Lakes Project, a program of the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources to maintain and improve the long-term health of the state’s
north-central lakes, the key elements of which are:
 | Updating the state’s shoreland management rules. |
 | Expanding the use of conservation easements. |
 | Developing stronger citizens-government partnerships. |
 | Forming regional sanitary districts. |
 | Increasing water-quality education for local officials and citizens. |
 | Increasing technical assistance and reporting project results. |
|
 | An Issues Symposium for TMLA members. |
IN THE TIME we spent brain-storming, the four of us had little difficulty
identifying potential issues for a Conservation Committee’s attention. But
absent most of those who had indicated an interest in the possibility of forming
such a committee, we decided to table our discussion until next summer when, we
hope, more volunteers will be available join in this formative process for what
may become a vitally important new TMLA committee.
top of page
|